Other

Letters: Extended schools

I was dismayed by the lack of understanding revealed by the Conservative Party in your recent article on its stance on extended schools (Children Now, 18-24 July). The suggestion that extended schools is a "top down" policy, and not driven by schools and communities, is far from the truth. It is also incorrect to suggest that schools are unable to choose which services are delivered.

The whole rationale behind the policy is the provision of better andmore coherent services. However, there is no requirement for schools toprovide the services themselves.

Frequently, the services are already available elsewhere in communities,but may not be coherent or accessible. Schools can direct parents andchildren to the appropriate place.

There may be a debate to be had over whether schools should be in solecharge of providing services. However, research shows schools are notalways best placed to understand the community's needs. The best successhas been achieved where schools work with the communities to evolveappropriate services.

Julian Piper, director of extended and integrated services,ContinYou

- We welcome your views. Please write, including address and phonenumber, to: The editor, Children Now, 174 Hammersmith Road, London W67JP, or email cn.editorial@haymarket.com. We reserve the right to editletters for publication.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this