Other

Editorial: Ofcom can never be independent on TV ads

1 min read
Life continues to be far from quiet for Ofcom, even though its consultation on junk food advertising aimed at children has now closed. In fact, the furore that has characterised the debate is continuing, with the Children's Food Bill coalition now accusing Ofcom of "secrecy and spin" over its refusal to reveal how many consultation responses have called for restrictions on junk food ads before the 9pm watershed (see News, p5).

This war of words is nothing new as campaigners have regularlycriticised the media watchdog's handling of the issue. For instance,when the regulator unveiled its proposals in March to either ban orrestrict adverts for unhealthy food during the times of the day whenchildren were likely to be watching TV, it immediately walked intocontroversy due to its unwillingness to contemplate a total ban on suchadverts before the 9pm watershed.

Ofcom was upfront about its reticence, which it said was due to thedisproportionate costs of such a move to broadcasters. Unsurprisingly,health and children's organisations were equally frank in theirresponse, with 50 national organisations calling for a judicial reviewof Ofcom's decision. The final result of such pressure saw Ofcomcapitulating, by agreeing to add the pre-watershed ban as an option toits consultation (Children Now, 28 June-4 July).

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)