Walsall and Sandwell were both found to be falling short on work to protect the public.
Staff in Walsall were judged to be carrying out the work satisfactorily 49 per cent of the time and, in Sandwell, 52 per cent of the time. Inspectors in Walsall said that half the risk of serious harm screenings were not accurate with, in one case, previous inappropriate sexual behaviour and phone calls to female members of staff having not been noted.
Inspectors in Walsall found that in more than two-thirds of cases (71 per cent), risk of serious harm assessments did not draw adequately on all appropriate Information.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here