Analysis

'Shared parenting' gets rejected

The Family Justice Review has denied the presumption of shared parenting. Kirsten Anderson, Carolyn Hamilton and Jo-Anne Prudhomme from the Coram Children's Legal Centre examine why

The Conservative Manifesto, published before the election in 2010, stated that, if the party came to power, it would conduct a comprehensive review of family law and would encourage shared parenting. In November, the Family Justice Review was duly published. One of the issues considered by the review was that of "shared parenting". It examined whether legislation should be amended to include a presumption of shared parenting.

While not a strictly legal concept, "shared parenting" in family law generally refers to the presumption that children of divorced or separated parents should spend an equal (or almost equal) amount of time with each parent – a 50-50 split. The concept has largely been promoted by fathers’ organisations that contend that a child’s life is enhanced if both parents continue to be significantly involved in the child’s life following separation or divorce.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)