The education select committee’s report into participation by 16- to 19-year-olds in education and training criticised the government for failing to acknowledge the impact education maintenance allowance (EMA) had on participation, attainment and retention before deciding on its replacement.
According to the committee, the replacement bursary scheme will lead to inconsistencies, which will eventually impact on where young people choose to study.
Committee members concluded that bursaries administered by schools and colleges will not necessarily be fairer or more discriminating than a slimmed-down, more targeted entitlement such as the EMA.
Chair of the committee Graham Stuart said: "Young people taking life-defining decisions at 16 need clear information on the support they may receive and deserve better than rushed and ill thought through reforms.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here
