Other

Opinion: Debate - Should Sure Start's success be judged on hitting targets?

1 min read
An evaluation of Sure Start is likely to reveal that it has not met all its national targets, but some programme managers say these might not be the best indicators of success and that the identification of local priorities is more important.

NO - Tim Loughton, shadow children's minister

The success of Sure Start should be measured on the quality of its outcomes, not the latest artificial Government targets. It is also important that Sure Start projects are not assessed in isolation but on the impact that they have had on the wider community and other similar schemes already in existence. We await the full evaluation with interest but Conservatives support the concept, will increase its funding and want to extend Sure Start's coverage beyond the Government's current ambitions.

YES - Jill Kirby, chair of the family policy group, the Centre for Policy Studies

Sure Start has been an expensive part of the Government's early years strategy, focused on a limited number of neighbourhoods. Independent evaluation is clearly necessary to find out if the programme is really making a difference, and targets have to be part of that. It is possible to make direct comparisons, to gauge the extent to which targets are being met. With measurable targets it's important to know if definite progress has been made.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this