Other

NCB Now: Comment - We must hold our nerve on Every Child Matters

1 min read
Last week, when the Government launched its implementation plan for children's centres and extended schools, Ruth Kelly's speech focused almost entirely on how the developments offered more choice for parents. True enough - but that is not the real reason to welcome the expansion. There should be two tests as to whether children's centres and extended schools are a good thing: do they improve outcomes for children, and do they offer what parents believe their children need? Ruth Kelly's focus - on parental convenience - comes third.

Fortunately the evidence suggests that the new policies can pass bothtests. There is plenty to show that quality integrated early yearsservices, delivered by qualified staff, improve outcomes for allchildren, particularly those from poorer backgrounds. Still moreevidence demonstrates that the Every Child Matters approach of lookingat all outcomes for children in schools brings real gains to educationalattainment.

And the evidence is very strong that this more rounded approach tochildren's needs is what parents want too. What have been the big publicissues concerning children in schools in the last year? Child protection- "staying safe" - and school dinners - "being healthy". It seems thatEvery Child Matters is that rare creature - a cross-party policy whichis successful in meeting children's needs, but also popular withparents.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this