Other

Editorial: London's curfew is a Draconian measure

2 mins read

The police insist these new measures don't represent a curfew in the sense that most of the media coverage of this initiative has suggested.

They say the measures aim to disperse rowdy gangs of unruly youths and lone children who could be in danger.

Fair enough. Under Section 30 of the Antisocial Behaviour Act 2003, they are correct. However, there's a thin line between point six of this section, which says police can remove someone under 16 who isn't under the effective control of a parent or "responsible" person aged 18 or over, and a curfew.

This is especially true when you listen to Sir Ian Blair (no relation), deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, who says no "responsible parent would like their 15-year-old unaccompanied in the West End after 9pm".

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

CEO

Bath, Somerset

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”