Other

BACK PAGE: Hound - Between the lines in the past week's media

2 mins read
You rarely hear anyone speaking in favour of the nanny state.

So, quiet please for the proposals of Labour MP Eric Martlew. He is introducing a law to force under-16s to wear helmets when cycling. "Nannies look after children," he said. "And that's what this Bill seeks to do."

The row about whether it will work will freewheel at least until the brakes are applied at the second reading of his private member's Bill in April. Opponents say compulsory helmet wearing will deter children from cycling, a disastrous move when youngsters are being encouraged to exercise more, not less.

But let's stick with nannies. What most of us know about nannies is that they are rather pricey. This is also true of the requirements of nanny states. Under Martlew's plans, kids caught bare-headed on bikes will face fines of 40. That amounts to 21 weeks' income, given the average 11-year-old's pocket money is 1.88 a week. Or the equivalent of several thousands of pounds to an average adult.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

CEO

Bath, Somerset