Blogs

Gove's Review gets it - broadly - right !!

2 mins read
4.21 In addition, we are concerned that an instrumental attitude, which values test and examination results and certificates as ends in themselves, has become increasingly evident in the English system. This diminishes the priority that should be given to ensuring that the underlying learning being accredited is deep and secure.

I've been waiting for the outcome of the review of the National Curriculum with interest, and the first report, I must say, is encouraging. I support the extension of Key Stage 4 to three years. Although it will require large-scale revision to the GCSE, this is well overdue. That, I imagine, is why implementation is being delayed a year. The commitment to less specification is sensible, though, inevitably, schools will select what they teach based on examination syllabuses, as they used to do before the National Curriculum. The broadening of the Key Stage 4 curriculum is welcome, particularly in light of the Raising of the Age of Participation, a Labour policy enacted in the Education and Skills Act 2008 and supported by the Coalition Government. Specialisation can sensibly follow at the age of 16. And the proposals to redefine 'core', 'foundation' and 'basic' are welcome as well.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this