Other

Truancy: Money should be spent more wisely

1 min read
The 885m spent by the Government since 1997 to reduce absence in schools would have been better spent on more frontline workers, say senior education welfare leaders.

Lawrence Warburton, a principal education welfare officer and president of the National Association of Social Workers in Education, said the money could have employed 3,560 frontline education welfare officials to work directly with schools, pupils and their families. "This would have led to an improvement on the current (absence) figures," he said.

A report on improving school attendance in England by the National Audit Office said the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) must improve communications with and between local authority education welfare services and schools if some of the initiatives funded by this money are to work more effectively.

The report said some local authorities felt the DfES advisers "did not provide expertise over and above that of their own staff, and some did not tailor their advice to meet local circumstances". Warburton said: "There is a wealth of experience within education social work teams in local education authorities and it was not acknowledged or used."

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this