Other

Sentencing: Magistrates ignore advice of youth justiceprofessionals

1 min read

The work, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council, questions previous assumptions that youth justice practice is evidence-based and young people's views are taken into account. It looks at how those working in youth justice make judgments and says magistrates often disregard the advice of youth offending teams and other professionals.

The research, Youth Justice - stereotype or evidence based?, was released yesterday (15 May). It suggests professionals rely on their own observations and interactions with young people as a primary source of information, rather than reports from third parties.

The study also claims that while young people offered their own explanations for their actions, these were not conveyed to police or magistrates.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this