Other

Legal Update: Court Report - Council appeals against costs order

Case name: S (A Child)

Case number: 2015 UKSC20

Location: Supreme Court

Judges: Lady Hale (deputy president), Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson

The case was an appeal by a local authority in relation to a costs order made against the authority. The father of a young girl had appealed against a placement order obtained by a local authority for the girl's adoption, without her father's consent. The Court of Appeal ordered the local authority to pay the father's costs of the appeal, in which he had been successful. In bringing the appeal, the father incurred legal costs assessed at £13,787. The Court of Appeal ordered that the local authority should pay those costs because it had resisted the appeal, and in order not to deter a parent from challenging decisions which impact on the relationship with their children. The issue in this case was whether the Court of Appeal was right in deciding to order costs against the local authority, given the principle confirmed by the Supreme Court in In re T (Care Proceedings: costs) (2012) UKSC 36 that in general, local authorities should not be ordered to pay costs in care proceedings.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)