Other

Editorial: GPs must have a formal child protection role

1 min read
At first sight, the news that some GPs are calling for child protection to be a service that primary care trusts fund will shock many children's professionals (Health News, p10). The idea that doctors will have to be paid to take child protection concerns into account seems to be at odds with the child-centred philosophy that underpins other children's services.

And it will confirm many of the suspicions that frontline practitioners have about doctors' attitudes towards child protection, which they believe range from disinterest to outright obstruction.

Of course, this antipathy is not completely one-sided. GPs often feel misunderstood and maligned by their colleagues in social care and education.

For instance, while social services staff complain about GPs' lack of attendance at area child protection committee meetings, GPs point out that these meetings often fall at the worst time of the week for them meaning they're unable to attend or must hire a locum.

At the heart of these complex misunderstandings, however, is a simple explanation. While the different parts of the workforce have always operated under different terms and conditions, GPs' working arrangements are a world apart from anyone else's. Local primary care trusts commission GPs to carry out specific services and, consequently, GPs run their surgeries like small businesses.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)