Other

Challenging behaviour: Value of residential care questioned

The chair of the Commission for Social Care Inspection has questioned whether placing challenging teenagers in residential homes is a good use of money.

Denise Platt said the number of children's homes for one or two childrenhas increased significantly during the past year. But a place in achildren's home can be 1,000 a week more expensive than a fosterplacement. She asked: "Are we putting our money in the right place?"

Her question was prompted by a Fostering Network lecture on Nancy Hazel,who in 1975 set up a pioneering fostering scheme for teenagerspreviously regarded as "unfosterable". The scheme paid carers similaramounts to the cost of providing residential care.

Robert Tapsfield, chief executive of the network, said: "Perhaps it'stime services revisited Hazel's messages on the importance of goodtraining, support and pay."

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this