Opinion

Why is our response to Neets so inadequate?

1 min read
The revelation by the London School of Economics that there could be double the recorded number of young people not in education, employment or training (Neet) should be no surprise. What is a surprise is that no one is yet making a connection between such "inactivity" and "activity" in informal economic and illegal domains including, probably, violent crime.

More than 10 years ago, the Home Office showed interest in trying to map this relationship by doing a retrospective study of Neet status and criminality. The plan was to have a sample of 18-year-olds register offending behaviour week by week over the previous two years and to consider this against their engagement in education, training or employment. I pointed out that some of the most important members of any such sample were unlikely to remember much in any detail beyond the previous couple of weeks. A pilot was commissioned, but abandoned soon afterwards for precisely these reasons.

If one-fifth of our youth population is hanging around doing very little - a figure very similar to that suggested when Neets were "discovered" in 1993 - then we should be deeply concerned, both for their futures and for the cohesion of our society. The raft of policies - which are security measures - directed towards Neets for more than a decade seem to have made little difference.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)