Opinion

Inspections rift must be resolved

1 min read Social Care Editorial
The first no-notice safeguarding inspections have triggered an unseemly spat between local authorities and Ofsted.

Our lead story last week revealed the strength of feeling against Ofsted's use of the descriptor "serious concerns" to cover issues of process and paperwork as well as practice.

As a result of our story, the BBC's Today programme last Friday pitted Association of Directors of Children's Services president Kim Bromley-Derry against Ofsted director for children Roger Shippam. Both outline their positions here this week (see p8).

Thankfully, Ofsted appears to have backed down, saying it will "consider revising" the words and confine the term "serious concern" to matters of child protection practice.

Inspections should of course where necessary alert councils to their failings and challenge them to improve. The term "serious concerns" is an emotive one and sets off alarm bells. But CYP Now has heard of one spot check where inspectors examined 60 child protection referrals, found two of the 60 had missed a seven-day deadline for filing papers by just two days - and called that a "serious concern". Such a senseless use of the term makes a mockery of its reports, so the revision of its terminology cannot come soon enough.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here

Posted under:


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)