News

Popular child protection practices 'may not work'

Many child protection practices currently used by social workers, such as multi-agency safeguarding hubs (Mash) may be ineffective, as there is a lack of evidence about whether they make a positive difference, it has been claimed.

A study by the Early Intervention Foundation (EIF) concluded that the lack of evidence underpinning some practices and approaches that are widely used in the child protection system means it is "difficult to be sure protection services are producing good results or providing value for money".

A particular concern is a dearth of evidence relating to approaches where professionals from a range of organisations work together to protect children. This includes "a lack of robust evaluation" of the impact of multi-agency safeguarding hubs (Mash), where professionals link up to deal with concerns of children at risk of harm.

Researchers also found there was a lack of evidence that Signs of Safety, which aims to improve the relationships between child protection workers and vulnerable families, is effectively reducing the maltreatment of children.

Signs of Safety was developed in Australia in the 1990s and is being implemented in the UK by Professor Eileen Munro.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Student Services Adviser

Wandsworth, London (Greater)

Youth Work in Hertfordshire

Opportunities in districts across Hertfordshire

Enrichment Officer

Wandsworth, London (Greater)