News

Identification concerns put plans to publish full serious case review in doubt

1 min read Social Care
Junior children's minister Tim Loughton has said the government's plan to retrospectively publish the full serious case review of one of four high-profile cases is in doubt because of fears over the identification of surviving children.

In June, Loughton told CYP Now that the government would publish in full the serious case reviews of Baby Peter, Khyra Ishaq, the Edlington brothers and Shannon Matthews.

But addressing the Education Select Committee this week, he revealed that there were concerns about one of the cases which may prevent its full publication.

Responding to a question posed by committee member and Liberal Democrat MP Tessa Munt, Loughton said: "We said [the reviews] should be published subject to anonymisation, appropriate redaction and subject to there being no threat to the welfare of a surviving child or siblings.

"There may be examples in the future where local safeguarding children boards can make an argument as to why a serious case review should not be published in full. One of the retrospective reports we are looking to have published at the moment may come under that bracket and if it does it won’t be published."

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here

Posted under:


More like this