Blogs

Engage in staff:child nursery ratio debate

1 min read The Early Years Blog
In July I wrote a blog calling parents, staff and colleagues to get their heads around the ratio debate and understand why reducing ratios are bad for children, bad for staff and will not reduce fees to parents.
June O'Sullivan is chief executive of LEYF. Picture: LEYF
June O'Sullivan is chief executive of LEYF. Picture: LEYF

Why is ratio change a bad idea?

The main reason for this change is to reduce the cost of childcare to parents. HOWEVER, there is NO (and I repeat, no) evidence that increasing the number of children will have any impact on the cost of childcare.  

How could there be when we are already losing an average of £1.07 per hour per child, and 64 per cent are operating at a loss. In fact, the research from the Early Years Alliance said 78 per cent of nurseries would not increase their fees this year or limit the increase, if the funding offered by the government actually covered costs. So, what actually would help parental fees, is an increase in funding. In fact, I cannot think of many winners of ratio changes, except maybe the odd shareholder and director.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)