In his final recommendations to the government, review chair Josh MacAlister suggests the creation of an independent child advocacy service which would see IRO roles and regulation 44 visitors for children in residential care replaced by one child advocate position.
Responding to the review Nagalro chair, Carole Littlechild said: Nagalro has always had a central concern about making sure that the voice of the child was heard. Nagalro is, therefore, concerned to see that the report proposes to dispense with the role of the IRO.”
She added that while the organisation would “welcome children in care having access to dedicated advocates who can act as advisers, facilitators and a spokesperson for their views,” she believes that MacAlister “has failed to fully understand the role of the IRO and is in danger of ‘throwing out the baby with the bathwater’”.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here
