Inspections Clinic: Appealing an Ofsted judgment


There will always be early years settings unhappy with the rating they receive from Ofsted. Jo Stephenson looks at the options for appealing the decision and the processes to follow.

While 94 per cent of early years providers are now rated "good" or "outstanding", for the small proportion who receive a negative judgment the impact can be devastating.

"The implications of a poor inspection can be the end of a setting," explains Michael Freeston, director of quality improvement at the Pre-school Learning Alliance.

"Particularly when it comes to two-year-old [free childcare] funding because settings are not allowed to take it unless they are rated good or above. Meanwhile, local authorities have the discretion to take three- and four-year-old [free childcare] funding away if you are less than good so these are serious considerations that need to be borne in mind."

Concern about early years inspection judgments is not that much of an issue currently, he explains.

However, it was a different story in 2013 when the introduction of a new inspection regime saw the proportion of settings achieving the good and outstanding ratings plummet almost overnight and a significant increase in those rated "inadequate".

There was widespread concern about fairness and consistency but things are now back on an even keel - partly because the sector has got much better at demonstrating what it does - especially when it comes to education, explains Freeston.

There have also been changes in the way Ofsted handles complaints and in who carries out inspections.

In 2015, Ofsted ended its contract with external providers of schools and further education inspections to "improve consistency and reliability across our inspection workforce". In 2016/17, the regulator stopped contracting with external providers of early years inspections.

"As of April 2017, all our inspectors work directly for us," states Ofsted's 2016/17 annual report. "This improves communication and allows us to provide training and support directly."

In 2016/17, Ofsted set itself a target of meeting 95 per cent of quality standards across all inspection remits. This target was met for schools and social care but narrowly missed for further education and early years.

"Where quality standards are not met, this may be because an inspector's writing initially lacked clarity, or because a draft report has not met all the reporting requirements," says the annual report.

"Our quality assurance arrangements mean that before a report is published we address any issues that have been identified so that published reports meet the required standard."

Meanwhile, in September 2015 the regulator introduced a new level of independent scrutiny to its complaints process in an effort to make it more transparent, fair and objective (see below).

Ofsted's annual report shows complaints have fallen across all the areas it inspects for two years in row with just 2.2 per cent of inspection activities resulting in complaints in 2016/17 (see graphics).

 

"We are open and transparent about our procedures for complaints about our work. That is why sector representatives who do not work for Ofsted provide further independent scrutiny as part of the internal review process," says an Ofsted spokesman.

"But we would always hope it doesn't get to that stage. If any early years setting has a concern about Ofsted's work, we urge them to raise it as soon as possible, so that the concern can be considered and resolved swiftly."

Freeston agrees that addressing concerns at the earliest opportunity - during an inspection or at the draft report stage - is the best way to go.

"If the inspection has been carried out well then you would have been actively involved in the inspection, doing joint observations with the inspector and having conversations with parents," he says. "There should have been ongoing feedback throughout the day about the emerging findings so that should give you the opportunity to address any comments that you feel don't reflect your practice and improve things as the day goes on."

However, if a nursery manager is not happy with a final inspection judgment then his advice is "don't complain in haste".

"Obviously you're disappointed, frustrated, angry if things haven't gone well but don't immediately fire off an email to Ofsted," he cautions. "You have got to look at it objectively and discuss it with colleagues first. Sleep on it or come back to it after the weekend and reflect on whether actually you could have done X better or perhaps didn't show the inspector some evidence that may have changed the judgment.

"It has got to be a very dispassionate consideration of whether there are genuine grounds for challenging a judgment."

It could be that making a complaint is cathartic and some managers may feel it is important for staff morale and has a value in itself when it comes to galvanising both practitioners and parents.

But Freeston says time and energy may well be better spent thinking about how to show improvement for the next inspection visit, which will be within three months if a setting is rated inadequate or six months if judged "requires improvement".

"We would ask a setting: is it better to use your energies appealing the last one or should you just say: ‘Okay they've judged this, we believe they're wrong, let's show them they are wrong when they come back in three or six months'," he explains.

"As well as being honest with yourselves during that period of reflection, it is important to have conversations with parents to say: ‘We've had this, here is why we believe it happened, does that impact on your view about whether your child continues coming here?' and in many cases it doesn't.

"It's not all about the Ofsted grade - we obviously fixate on it within the sector but for parents it might not be the be all and end all that we fear. Being open and honest with parents is a major point of the improvement process - as well as making sure those parents are then available to actually talk to the Ofsted inspector when they come back."

Step-by-step guide to making a complaint about an Ofsted inspection

  1. The majority of concerns raised by early years providers and others are raised directly at an inspection, with most resolved by inspectors before the process is completed.
  2. If a provider is not satisfied, it can submit a formal complaint online. It will be contacted by an investigating officer to discuss issues ahead of a detailed investigation and written response.
  3. If a provider still has concerns, it can request an internal review to check if the investigation has been carried out properly. Before it is finalised, the outcome of this review will be considered by a scrutiny panel, chaired by a senior Inspector. The panel includes an early years sector representative external to Ofsted - such as the manager of successful daycare provision - and an Ofsted early years specialist. Settings can expect a response within 30 days of the date the review was requested.
  4. If the complaint has not been resolved to the setting's satisfaction, managers can request a review of the way it was handled by the Independent Complaints Adjudication Service for Ofsted although adjudicators cannot overturn inspection judgments or decisions.
  5. The final step it to refer concerns to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.

INSPECTIONS SHORTS

  • EDUCATION Ofsted has written to 114 head teachers across eight exclusion "hot spots" to raise concerns about the high numbers of pupils being removed from schools in their area. The areas - all in the North East, and Yorkshire and the Humber regions - are Middlesbrough, Barnsley, Redcar and Cleveland, Doncaster, North Lincolnshire, Rotherham, Sheffield, and North East Lincolnshire. Ofsted inspectors visiting schools in these areas have also been asked to look carefully at the use of exclusion when making judgments about leadership and management of pupils' behaviour.
  • SOCIAL CARE Local authorities that work with others as part of regional adoption agencies (RAAs) are still individually responsible for ensuring they are meeting the needs of local children, says Ofsted. The regulator clarified arrangements for inspecting councils that are part of RAAs in a new section of guidance on the inspection regime for children's services from 2018 onwards. "Where an authority is part of an RAA, inspectors will still look at the planning, decision making and matching for the children in that local authority," says the guidance, which also confirms each authority must still appoint one of its own officers as the responsible officer for the adoption service.
  • EARLY YEARS Ofsted has published a new "quick guide" for nannies interested in registering with the regulator. While nannies are not required to sign up with Ofsted, being registered means parents may be able to get help paying for the childcare they provide.
  • YOUTH JUSTICE More must be done to reduce the "consistently high level of violence" at the young person's unit at HMP and YOI Parc, says the chief inspector of prisons. A survey found 63 per cent of boys at the facility in Bridgend South Wales reported victimisation by other children. Although levels of violence had decreased they were "still too high", found an unannounced inspection in October last year.
  • HEALTH Health, education and council leaders in Medway have been criticised by inspectors for failing to work together to improve support for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Concerns raised following a joint visit by Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission, included high rates of exclusion among SEND pupils and a lack of accountability and oversight when it came to the switch to education, health and care plans. Medway Council said it was working with partners to address the issues raised.

CYP Now Digital membership

  • Policy and research analysis
  • Evidence-based case studies
  • Leadership advice
  • Legal updates
  • Local area spotlights

From £170 /year

Subscribe

CYP Now Magazine

  • Policy and research analysis
  • Evidence-based case studies
  • Leadership advice and interviews
  • Legal updates

From £136 /year

Subscribe