
The Q-O design offers an alternative to “gold standard” counterfactual studies, such as randomised control trials, by integrated impact evaluation and continuous improvement within the same youth organisation. Through combining measures of quality and outcomes, the approach can offer detailed information about practice that is needed for continuous quality improvement alongside insight to help understand impact.
Aims and methodology
The purpose of Q-O design is twofold: first, to identify and differentiate subgroups of provision for young people according to the quality of practice that is provided; then, to compare the social and emotional skill growth of individual young people across those subgroups. In other words, the evaluation design assesses “skill growth by level of quality” across a cohort of youth organisations.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here