Nasty, hellish and possessing the ability to make bad people worse. This is the way some sentencers regard the juvenile secure estate, according to a new Youth Justice Board (YJB) study.
The report, Fine Art or Science, finds that despite scepticism about the value of custody, there is a widespread view among sentencers that custodial sentences are handed to young offenders because they have become "unavoidable".
This can be down to the seriousness of an offence, but the report reveals judges and magistrates more commonly describe feeling that community alternatives have been exhausted and "enough is enough".
The findings coincide with a Justice Committee report published last week that claims current sentencing policy risks being driven by a "misconception of what the public want", which can often be interpreted as longer custodial sentences.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here