2. This definition clearly refers to so-called "relative poverty". It proposes that a child is poor if their family lacks the money to enable them to play a full part in the society in which they live. It therefore follows that if the society changes, then so does the actual definition of poverty. However, some people find this perspective annoying, because they argue that as society's expectations change, the number of people in poverty can vary. They see this not as poverty but as inequality, and claim that it is not right to confuse the two.
3. Absolute poverty, a term used more in developing countries than the UK, describes those living without the basic essentials that are necessary for life. These are usually acknowledged as being shelter, food, clothing and drinking water. Social needs are ignored. The trouble with this is that human beings live in societies. A family would strike most people as poor if they could not afford a cup of tea, a birthday present for a child or to visit a friend. But there is no nutrition in tea and nothing essential to life about a birthday present or having friends. So they wouldn't register on a measure of absolute poverty.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here