Other

Opinion: Letter - Language must be changed

1 min read
The improved relationship between Cafcass and campaigning organisations for fathers is welcome news, but I am staggered by how little the language of both professionals and commentators seems to have changed since the introduction of the Children Act 1989.

No-one "wins" children anymore or has them "awarded" to them. Children are not objects. There is no such thing as "custody" or "access". The whole language of the Children Act (subsequently extended to unmarried fathers named on the birth certificate) is about continuing shared responsibility, whoever the children live with and whatever happens to the parents' relationship.

Perhaps the courts, the media and government are all to blame for the fact that ordinary parents don't seem to have noticed much difference and are still stuck in pre-Children Act thinking. No wonder outcomes are seen as unsatisfactory for the children. And we don't yet know how things would be if the Act was actually implemented as intended.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)