Other

Opinion: Debate - Should police remove lone teens from central London?

1 min read
In a bid to reduce anti-social behaviour and crime, the Metropolitan Police has created a "dispersal area" in the heart of London's entertainment district, giving it the power to remove unaccompanied under-16s between 9pm and 6am.

NO - Anne Longfield, chief executive, 4Children

Media perception of the teenage yob as a focus for anti-social behaviour policies is a vicious cycle of self-fulfilling prophesies that can only be broken if we perceive children and young people as an asset, not a liability. Rather than police time, we need to look at increasing and furthering the children's workforce - integrating outreach workers, childcare professionals and social workers - to ensure vulnerable young people are protected, diverted and safe, yet at the same time respecting their inherent rights as citizens.

NO - Lucy Knappett, 17, chair of Chichester Youth Council

I think that adults should treat children the way that they'd like to be treated. Not all children and young people are perfect, but neither are all adults. Maybe this means that some adults should also be excluded from the area - see how they like it! In reality, I don't think that shutting out young people and children will achieve anything other than more unnecessary work for the police. Involving young people would surely be a more positive action to take.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)