Other

NCB Now: Comment - Long-term investment in services must be our goal

1 min read
However even-handed we may try to be, most of us within the children's sector have particular issues that fire our imaginations and - sometimes - our indignation. In these situations we are tempted to argue that those issues should be treated as special cases, with clear political priority and dedicated government funding.

But is ringfenced money really the best way to ensure the long-term provision of key services?

Of course, there are times when ringfenced funding is both appropriate and necessary. It can help establish new or under-resourced services, as venture capital can kickstart a business until such time as it moves into profit. Children's play, for example, is a service that has never really had its moment in the sun, and which needs a sustained burst of investment to secure its future. That is one reason why ensuring that play receives the promised 200m of Lottery money is such a critical issue.

There is also an argument for finding ways of nursing services through the transition from ringfenced to mainstream funding. For instance, many local authorities have had difficulty in maintaining the provision developed for care leavers with the money that followed the Children (Leaving Care) Act. This situation may be repeated in 2006 when dedicated funding for teenage pregnancy programmes is due to end.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

CEO

Bath, Somerset

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”