Other

National Children's Bureau: Comment - Are punitive measureseffective against truancy?

1 min read
Reducing truancy - a key Government target for some years - is proving a hard nut to crack. Annual figures announced in September 2005 showed that, far from going down, truancy rates in England's secondary schools rose by 10 per cent in 2003/4.

The Government's reaction has been to get tough, focusing particularlyon parental responsibility for children's education, with the option ofcustodial sentences for those parents who fail in their duty. But isthis the right approach to the problem? Would a welfare response,involving both young people and their parents, be more effective,especially in persistent cases where parental authority may already becompromised?

One long-standing but little-used measure is the education supervisionorder. The orders are a provision of the Children Act 1989 and apply tochildren of compulsory school age who are not being properly educated. Alocal education authority must appoint a suitably qualified orexperienced person to agree a programme of work with the child and hisor her parents to ensure a proper education is received.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)