Other

Letters: Keep secure homes open

1 min read
How sad, yet so typical, that just a week after the Youth Justice Board (YJB) announced it is closing secure children's homes (CYP Now, 9-15 April) Ofsted publishes a report which involved talking to the young people in these units, which came up with the positive results prisons and secure training centres could only dream of.

The majority of young people said they were being "well" or "very well" looked after, with positive notices on safety and education. So why help close more homes? The YJB tells us that it doesn't have sufficient numbers of vulnerable children to meet demand, but its response is predicated on a very narrow vision of the role of secure children's homes. All children who require custody deserve the quality of care these units provide.

Frances Crook, director, The Howard League for Penal Reform

Support for new leaving age

Your article (CYP Now, 9-15 April) refers to an Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL) motion "to start a campaign to keep the school leaving age at 16" quoting a delegate who condemned "this negative policy of compulsion".

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)