Other

Leaving age plans are too 'simplistic'

1 min read Education
A leading academic has accused the government of superficial thinking for its plans to raise the education-leaving age.

In a book to be published by the Social Market Foundation think-tank tomorrow (27 March), Professor Alan Smithers says the idea is based on the "simplistic notion that more education for more is better".

He argues the policy of keeping young people in education or training until they are 18 ignores differences in their biological development and questions whether vocational qualifications will help them to find jobs.

The University of Buckingham researcher also said the move would do little to help teenagers not in employment, education or training. "Occupying them by keeping them in education and training has the same superficial appeal as it did in the 19th century, but it is unlikely to benefit many of the young people themselves," he said.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)