Other

Editorial: Why welfare reform will always be tricky

1 min read
A review of the Welfare to Work system, with a banker in charge of the process, was always going to ruffle a few feathers. So the news that David Freud's proposals have pleased the Government but angered others is no surprise (See Analysis, p12).

It's not difficult to see why the Prime Minister and Chancellor are keenon Freud's principal recommendations of greater involvement of theprivate and voluntary sector in getting people back to work, and thatlone parents with children over the age of 12 could have their benefitscut if they refuse to get a job.

Ministers are keenly aware of the adverse consequences of long-termunemployment on the health of adults and their children. They alsounderstand the best way to lift children out of poverty is to have themgrow up in a household where at least one parent works.

Equally understandable, however, is the loud warning bell that has beenrung by child poverty campaigners about the results of adopting whatappear to be such punitive proposals. Alongside their anxieties over thepotential damage to the voluntary sector's independence by engaging inwelfare provision, they have concerns about forcing parents to work oncetheir children reach an arbitrary age.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)