Other

Editorial: Ministers' actions speak louder than policy

1 min read
There will have been a great many parents who, last week, understood the reasons behind Ruth Kelly's decision to send her son with learning difficulties to a 15,000-a-year private school, rather than leaving him struggling in a mainstream state school. Yet there would have been few who felt much sympathy for the cabinet minister.

As a previous secretary of state for education, parents rightly believethat Kelly must bear some of the responsibility for a specialeducational needs (SEN) system that, in the words of the Education andSkills Select Committee, is "demonstrably no longer fit for purpose"(Children Now, 12-18 July 2006). And it's a system, which according tothe testimony of many parents, fails a sizeable proportion of the 1.5million children in England who have such needs.

This failure is often compounded because not only do families regularlystruggle to get a statement of needs for their children but, as thefeature on p18 reveals, these children are also far more likely to beexcluded from both primary and secondary schools for challengingbehaviour. This means that, firstly, families struggle to get theirchildren appropriate school places, then they have a fight on theirhands to keep them in school.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this