The independent study was ordered by the government after it rejected calls to introduce a legal presumption to give non-resident parents contact in the Children and Adoption Act 2006.
The study, carried out by the Oxford Centre for Family Law and Policy, examined 308 cases in what is the most comprehensive investigation into the matter to date.
It rejected claims that the family courts and the Child and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass) were biased against non-resident parents. Instead it highlighted how concerns about the child's welfare explained many of the decisions to refuse contact.
The researchers also found that resident parents who did not want the other parent to have contact were able to drag out proceedings so non-resident parents gave up their battle for access due to the emotional and financial cost of fighting the case. The findings suggested decisions in 10 per cent of the cases could be seen as unfair for the non-resident parent but the researchers said this "is not an enormous number and certainly does not suggest that a substantial proportion of non-resident parents are getting a poor deal".
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here
