This case concerned R, the half-sister of two younger siblings. R wished to have indirect contact with her siblings through letters.
A report produced by a Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass) officer supported R in her claim for indirect contact with her half-brother and sister. The officer believed that indirect communication with their sister would be beneficial for the children as it is important for them to learn about their background and heritage.
The father of the two younger siblings did not want them to have any contact with R.
He believed that this was a "backdoor" attempt for the children's mother, also the mother of R, to be reintroduced into the children's lives when she had not played any part in their lives for a considerable time. The court at first instance took account of the father's concerns and refused R's application for indirect contact.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here