Opinion

'Unfit’ asylum transfer scheme needs an overhaul

2 mins read
In 2015, during my ADCS presidency, we set up the voluntary transfer scheme for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) because Kent was becoming overwhelmed by the numbers requiring care.
Alison O'Sullivan: 'Providing for children who arrive after traumatic journeys has far-reaching impact across our child welfare system'. Picture: ADCS
Alison O'Sullivan: 'Providing for children who arrive after traumatic journeys has far-reaching impact across our child welfare system'. Picture: ADCS

The National Transfer Scheme (NTS) was established in 2016 and in the first five years there were an average of 42 transfers per month. By September 2023, the number of transfers had grown six-fold to average 264 per month. No one then could have foreseen the impact upon the care system – UASCs made up 21 per cent of all children taken into care by 2022/23.

The NTS, which became mandatory in December 2021, was never designed to manage the volume of arrivals and there is now a need to revisit a system that is no longer fit for purpose.

The last decade has seen a shameful dehumanisation of these often vulnerable and traumatised children who need our care and protection. In all the furore about “stopping the boats” and proposals to deport people to Rwanda, there’s been no recognition that nearly a quarter are children.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this