Opinion

Trial shows votes at 16 is a verdict to support

1 min read Editorial
I undertook jury service at the Old Bailey earlier this year. The case I adjudicated on was not a conventional trial, but deciding if the country is ready to lower the voting age to 16 for all UK elections.
Derren Hayes, editor, Children & Young People Now
Derren Hayes, editor, Children & Young People Now

I, along with 11 other jurors from the sector, were taking part in a specially arranged event to hear the arguments for and against votes at 16. After weighing up expert evidence – clearly presented and clinically cross-examined by young people on the prosecution and defence teams – the jury returned a majority decision in favour.

Sadly, our verdict has not resulted in 16- and 17-year-olds being able to have their say in the coming general election, despite support for this from MPs across the political divide.

The arguments for the change are well known: if, by the age of 16, you are able to work and pay taxes, join the armed forces and have sexual relations, then you should have the right to vote (see Opinion).

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

CEO

Bath, Somerset

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”