Opinion

Independent scrutiny is ‘grit’ in safeguarding system

“Oversight” is one of those words that can often raise an unintended smile, especially when it gets wheeled out in an official capacity.
Deborah McMillan is interim national safeguarding partner facilitator
Deborah McMillan is interim national safeguarding partner facilitator

Because – rather like its bedfellow “sanction” – it has the ability to mean two completely opposite things at the same time. It could be understood to mean “keeping watch over something”, yet, at the same time, it could just as easily convey “missing it altogether”. Hence the wry smiles whenever phrases like “political oversight group” get trotted out.

However, like most jokes, it contains a kernel of genuine anxiety because the concept of accountability drills down to our deepest fears – the acceptance of responsibility for one’s own actions. And with effective accountability must come independent scrutiny.

It is also what the Roman poet Juvenal was getting at with his famous question: “Who is watching the watchmen?” The reason that this phrase has endured through the centuries – from political speeches to graphic novels – is that it gets straight to the heart of who is holding who to account, and where is the “grit” in the system?

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)