Opinion

Education system needs better alternatives

2 mins read Discipline and exclusions
The education select committee's inquiry into alternative provision in education is part of its stated commitment to social justice. This is a social justice issue.

Astonishingly, for children whose behaviour is too difficult to manage in a mainstream school, there is little clarity about the route into - and, more importantly, out of - alternative provision, and parents often have very little say about whether it is the right solution.

Pupil referral units (PRUs) can provide excellent support and education for some students but not always, and the decision to send a child there may well have motives other than providing the most appropriate education and care.

More than 70 per cent of children in PRUs have a special educational need or disability (SEND). Given the higher cost of supporting children with SEND in mainstream schools there may be a financial incentive for referring them to a PRU. As the Special Educational Consortium, based at the National Children's Bureau, told the inquiry, the funding system gives schools a perverse incentive to exclude these children because the costs associated with them transfer to local authorities.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)