Opinion

Behind the 'real terms' con, schools face cuts

1 min read Education
The children and families minister Sarah Teather used her party conference to announce a doubling of the pupil premium from 625m to 1.25bn.

Seventeen per cent of children in England are eligible for free school meals, and their schools are allocated £430 a pupil, increasing next year to perhaps £800 a pupil. Of course, this is just a case of a politician claiming double credit, as the spending review last November included this increase, and we already know that the funding is planned to double again to £2.5bn by 2014/15. But in the present climate, we should be pleased that this increase in funding has been safeguarded.

Let's try to assess what it is really like in schools. Going back to the November spending review, the Treasury said: "There will be real terms increases of 0.1 per cent in each year of the spending review for the five to 16s school budget, including a £2.5bn pupil premium. Underlying per pupil funding will be maintained in cash terms." The 2010 Budget assumed inflation of two per cent. Even with the pupil premium increase, school budgets were only planned to increase by 2.1 per cent, so 0.1 per cent in real terms – close enough to zero not to matter. But inflation reached 4.5 per cent in August 2011, so spending power is in fact well into negative figures.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this

Hertfordshire Youth Workers

“Opportunities in districts teams and countywide”

Administration Apprentice

SE1 7JY, London (Greater)