News

Spending Review: Family hubs ‘no replacement’ for Sure Start, critics say

An £82m investment to create 75 family hubs in England is “no replacement” for Sure Start and the closure of thousands of children’s centres, critics have said.
The funding does not go far enough for babies and children, campaigners say. Picture: Adobe Stock
The funding does not go far enough for babies and children, campaigners say. Picture: Adobe Stock

Announcing his Autumn Budget and three-year Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), Chancellor Rishi Sunak pledged £300m to support new families.

The fund includes £82m for a raft of new family hubs to be overseen by the Anna Freud Centre and £201m to implement Andrea Leadsom’s Start for Life offer for new parents and babies.

The hubs will be designed to provide family help from pregnancy, through the child's youngest years and later childhood, and into adolescence until they reach the age of 24, the Anna Freud Centre said. 

However, sector leaders, campaigners and Labour Party politicians have said while the government’s focus on young people “could be a turning point for children and families”, concerns have been raised that the funding does “not go far enough” to match Labour’s Sure Start scheme, which at its peak boasted more than 3,000 children’s centres.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this