The parents brought the case over the council's 2018/19 budget, which highlighted possible savings totalling £21m to its schools and special educational needs and disabilities funding.
They claim the proposals were made without consultation but in a ruling this week, Lady Justice Sharp, sitting with Mrs Justice McGowan, dismissed their claims, saying the council did not have a duty to consult as it was only identifying possible savings in its budget and had not made any decision at that stage.
"In simple terms, the budget is part of a lawful local government accountancy process that identifies how savings might be made, but the budget is not set in stone," said their ruling.
Register Now to Continue Reading
Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:
What's Included
-
Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month
-
Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector
Already have an account? Sign in here