Research has shown that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can increase the risk of poor life outcomes, so policymakers and practitioners are developing new ways to prevent ACEs and support children at risk of them.
Social care and health agencies have adopted trauma-informed approaches to support vulnerable children and families.
Social care and health agencies have adopted trauma-informed approaches to support vulnerable children and families. - Picture: Adobe Stock/Pixel-Shot

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are a set of 10 traumatic events or circumstances occurring before the age of 18 that have been shown through research to increase the risk of adult mental health problems and debilitating diseases. Understanding of the impact that childhood traumatic events have on adult life outcomes has led to health and care agencies developing a questionnaire to assess the level of ACEs experienced by children and young people.

Information gathered through the questionnaire is used by clinicians and family support agencies to identify children and families experiencing adversity and offer help.

The adoption of the ACE framework has led to some states in the US developing widespread screening programmes in an effort to provide earlier interventions, while in the UK, the Welsh and Scottish governments have developed national strategies for tackling ACEs.

In England, the response has been more piecemeal, with individual local authorities, health departments and police forces developing initiatives for reducing ACEs, but no national strategy.

There has been widespread adoption by social care and health agencies of trauma-informed approaches to supporting vulnerable children and families. But again the lack of a national set of standards for training in the field many believe is a barrier to raising practice standards and children’s outcomes.

CYP Now’s special report on ACE assesses latest additions to the growing evidence base on the impact of ACE and how they are identified in children; summarises key policy developments across the UK; and profiles two examples of local agencies developing programmes to reduce the impact of ACEs.

Click on the links below for more:

Policy context

Research evidence:

Introduction

Agreement between prospective and retrospective measures of childhood victimization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Adolescent victimization and early-adult psychopathology: Approaching causal inference using a longitudinal twin study to rule out non-causal explanations

Early life adversity exposure and circulating markers of inflammation in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Client and provider discomfort with an adverse childhood experiences survey

Practice examples:

Agencies train ambassadors to spread ACE awareness

Sefton’s trauma-informed approach helps families to recover from ACEs


More like this