Analysis

Growing gap in secure care options for children in crisis

Shortage of the right places in secure children’s homes has seen a rise in "inherent jurisdiction" applications.
Aycliffe SCH is one of 14 such specialist residential homes in England and Wales
Aycliffe SCH is one of 14 such specialist residential homes in England and Wales

Latest research by the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (NFJO) has highlighted worrying trends over the past three years in the placement of vulnerable children into secure settings for welfare and mental health reasons.

Data analysis by the NFJO as part of an evidence review found that the number of applications made to the High Court to deprive children of their liberty under the “inherent jurisdiction” rule rose from 108 to 579 per year.

Inherent jurisdiction is a legal mechanism that allows an application to be made to a higher court for a legal order. It can be used when no other statutory mechanisms for depriving a child’s liberty apply – for example, if no place is available in a secure children’s home (SCH).

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this