Analysis

Focus on 30 hours limits places for disadvantaged two-year-olds

6 mins read Early Years
Research shows take-up of funded childcare for disadvantaged two-year-olds lags far behind that of three- and four-year-olds. Providers say insufficient funding makes it uneconomical to create two-year-old places.

A number of reports published last month have highlighted the possible detrimental impact that 30 hours of government-funded childcare is having on the early years sector.

The separate studies have been seized upon by early years organisations and leaders as further proof that 30 hours is not backed with sufficient government funding. This, they say, is hurting providers financially, which in turn is reducing availability of childcare places for disadvantaged children.

In September 2013, two-year-olds living in the 20 per cent most disadvantaged households were entitlement to 15 hours of government-funded childcare per week for a total of 38 weeks of the year. A year later, the offer was extended to two-year-olds living in the 40 per cent most deprived families.

Register Now to Continue Reading

Thank you for visiting Children & Young People Now and making use of our archive of more than 60,000 expert features, topics hubs, case studies and policy updates. Why not register today and enjoy the following great benefits:

What's Included

  • Free access to 4 subscriber-only articles per month

  • Email newsletter providing advice and guidance across the sector

Register

Already have an account? Sign in here


More like this