Youth funds improve community cohesion, finds report

By Ross Watson
Children & Young People Now
8 February 2010

The government's end of year report on its Youth Opportunity and Youth Capital Funds claims they have increased community cohesion and positive perceptions of young people.

The funds designed to empower disadvantaged young people, have provided £335m of funding since 2006, and will run until 2011.

ADVERTISEMENT

Youth Opportunity and Youth Capital Funds End Year Report 2008-9 said almost 2.5 million young people have been involved in the funds. It said: "Local areas report improvements in inter-generational relationships and community cohesion and increasing positive perceptions. Areas have also demonstrated the potential of funds to reduce antisocial behaviour in communities by engaging more young people in the determination of activities and through provision of activities that are able to engage harder to reach groups."

The report is based on based on visits to local authorities and analysis of around 150 end year reports provided by Government Offices and local authorities. 

But youth workers posting on CYP Now's forum have been sceptical that the views of young people, who are supposed to be involved in bidding for and distributing the grants, have been sufficiently taken into account.

One forum member said: "I picked up an application pack last week and was told that the scoring criteria favours applications which offer accredited outcomes and Friday/Saturday evening delivery. Is this really giving young people the ‘power to decide how this funding should be spent'?"

Another added: "Anything that is meant to be led by young people but has big piles of money attached to it does in my opinion seem to get manipulated by the powers that be."

 

Article Tools
 

Comments

Please log in or register to comment

Posted Comments

Fundraising Hack - 8 February 2010

Fair point, shall change for a more appropriate evil genius then... :op

Gods lonely youthworker . - 8 February 2010

[quote user="Fundraising Hack"]Thanks. That's you off my Christmas card list then sunshine! ;o) [/quote]

Sorry, it's your avatar.  How am I supposed to take you seriously with Father Jack glaring at me?

 

Fundraising Hack - 8 February 2010

[quote user="Gods lonely youthworker ."]I can’t vouch for the other blokes comments though, he sounds a bit dodgy to me.[/quote]

Thanks. That's you off my Christmas card list then sunshine! ;o)

I must admit I do find it a little strange to see myself quoted as a cynical voice of discontent when on balance I'd originally made the point that I'd personally found the YOF / YCF fund to be a real joy to work with our group but was aware that there are statutory youth work managers that I've reason to believe may be playing the system a bit which I stated in those terms rather than stated as fact, gossipy some might say but good fuel for debate I think... Like God's Lonely Youthworker I too would describe myself as an optimist with experience... My only agenda in this is to debate, learn and share ideas... :o)

 

Gods lonely youthworker . - 8 February 2010

[quote user="Kevin Sweeney"]Why does the publication include the comments of individuals as if they are fact? The validity of one person picking up one pack and not being happy about the content being treated as the same as 150 reports is not appropriate and is poor journalism. The actual Report is empirical evidence that the youth work approach actually can empower young people. Why can we not celebrate this fact rather than get caught up in the ramblings of a bunch of cynics? I regularly read the blogs and usually grind my teeth in frustration at some of the comments but try not to bite, but when your reporter takes the comments of individuals who have a clear agenda as being representative of youth workers then a line has been crossed. From my experience the Youth Opportunity Funds have made a real difference to young people not just in terms of improving facilities or resources but empowering young people. Crazy idea, folks why don't we celebrate when we get credit rather than looking for the bad in everything? I encourage scepticism as it involves critical analysis but what I see on the forums is a parade of cynics which is where they should remain - not quoted in an article about something which has benefited young people.[/quote]   

Well my comment is fact and I would quite gleefully prove it if it didn’t implicate my Local Authority.  See, even cynics have a conscience.  I can’t vouch for the other blokes comments though, he sounds a bit dodgy to me.   As I have pointed out in my thread, the YOF worked really well for me in a recent project and I was merely airing my concerns about the possible impact on future access by setting scoring criteria.  I'm allowed to be concerned aren't I?  Maybe this is more of an issue for me than it is for you and what I see as being important you see as being a bit trivial.  And so yes, I do have a “clear agenda”.  I like clear agendas.  They beat the hidden ones hands down.     

 

I must admit that I am a bit of a cynic.  Isn’t that normal in this sinister climate of new managerialism?  The only people who I know that aren’t cynical are the senior managers.  Hang on, you’re not are you...?  Never mind.  To be fair, I wasn’t looking for anything bad when I picked up my pack.  "Bad" just fell on me when I was told my youth group would have to shape its needs around some of those “hidden agendas”.    I doubt very much that you do encourage scepticism or even critical analysis for that matter.  I imagine you see it as scornful negativity and you want it locked away with all the other cynical ramblings.  Cynic?  I prefer to see myself as an optimist with experience.

 

[quote user="Kevin Sweeney"]C&YPN needs to do better in its quality of journalism.[/quote]   I beg to differ.  Its about time the journalism provoked some vibrant debate.  Let us celebrate the positives of this.  Well done, Ross.

Charlotte Goddard - 8 February 2010

Hi Kevin

I think we include the comments of individuals as if they were comments, not as if they were facts. That's the difference between something in quotes and something not in quotes.

If you feel differently to others who post why not post your own thoughts to provide a balanced view? Surely that is what forums are all about?

In my opinion the occasional article that points up what people are thinking on the forum is not bad journalism. It encourages debate.

Kevin Sweeney - 8 February 2010

Why does the publication include the comments of individuals as if they are fact? The validity of one person picking up one pack and not being happy about the content being treated as the same as 150 reports is not appropriate and is poor journalism. The actual Report is empirical evidence that the youth work approach actually can empower young people. Why can we not celebrate this fact rather than get caught up in the ramblings of a bunch of cynics? I regularly read the blogs and usually grind my teeth in frustration at some of the comments but try not to bite, but when your reporter takes the comments of individuals who have a clear agenda as being representative of youth workers then a line has been crossed. From my experience the Youth Opportunity Funds have made a real difference to young people not just in terms of improving facilities or resources but empowering young people. Crazy idea, folks why don't we celebrate when we get credit rather than looking for the bad in everything? I encourage scepticism as it involves critical analysis but what I see on the forums is a parade of cynics which is where they should remain - not quoted in an article about something which has benefited young people. There will be places where the process is not as effective as it should be and places where the involvement of young people is not as strong but on balance it seems there is evidence that it has worked. C&YPN needs to do better in its quality of journalism.

Latest Jobs

Find jobs working with children and young people

£32,532 - £38,733, Central London
£26,975 - £29,352 pro rata, East of England
£18,939 - £21,307*, North West England
c. £26k (pro rata 2.5 days pw), Yorkshire and Humberside
 

Latest Tenders