Badman review blasted by MPs' inquiry

By Lauren Higgs
Children & Young People Now
15 December 2009

A cross-party inquiry into Graham Badman's controversial review of home education has labelled the government's handling of the issue as an unfortunate episode.

The report by the Children, Schools and Families Select Committee accuses Badman and the Department for Children, Schools and Families of using "less than robust evidence" to suggest that home educated children are at greater risk of abuse than their school going counterparts.

ADVERTISEMENT

The committee warned that there is a "dearth of information on home educated children in England, not least basic data about the number of these children", which makes it impossible for government to make assumptions about the characteristics of home educating families.

The report recommends that research be carried out to establish the number of home-educated children and their outcomes.

It also suggests that the proposed new register for home educators should be voluntary, not compulsory, and home-educating families should provide statements of educational approach and take part in annual meetings with local authority officers.

Other measures advocated in the report include the introduction of a revised definition of what constitutes a "suitable" education and urgent action to clarify local authorities' responsibilities for home-educated children with special educational needs.

Barry Sheerman, chairman of the select committee, said local authorities must take responsibility for knowing whether children are in school, home educated or missing from education.
 
He added that councils must do more to work positively with home educating parents.

"This report is not concerned with whether a school or home education is superior. Our priority is to see that everything possible is being done so that all children are given the best start in life, are protected from harm and are equipped with the basic skills necessary in order to fulfil their potential and thrive," he said.

Article Tools
 

Comments

Please log in or register to comment

Posted Comments

jennie clark - 17 December 2009

How can we expect local authorities to hold accurate data on home educated children if registration is voluntary? How is the LA to find out whether children are missing from education or are saftly being home educated? The logistics needs to be considered.

John Bennett - 16 December 2009

The Badman report was ill-informed, amateurish and biased. A pity that Balls did not recognise this before he adopted it in its entirety.

It is difficult ot conceive of anything more certain to alienate the home-educating committee than this appalling lazy piece of work.

Louisa Southey - 16 December 2009

As a home educator I tentativaly welcome this report, however I fear that with relationships between Local Authorities and home educating families at an all time low, many will not want to register voluntarily. The home education community is collectively bruised by the vicious attack it has had to endure from the Badman review which was compiled with this 'less than robust' data. Actually 'less than robust' is in my opinion an understatement as during a recent meeting with my local authority we established that the data they provided was possibly inaccurate by up to a third. They claimed they were not able to cross check or update the infomation they provided. We only discovered this after Graham Badman requested further data which showed this discrepancy and we questioned the LA about this. Home educators accross the country have had to spend vast amounts of time and energy into opposing this unjustified attack on them which was actually brought about by the governemnt's own laws in relation to truency. Local Authorities have been advising the parents of truents to claim they are home educating to protect them from the courts or their children from expulsion. However rather than look upon this as time away from our primary objective, many of us have used this in the education of our children specifically with regards to victimisation of minority groups, how parliament works etc. Although we are diverse in many aspects of our lives we came together to fight and protect our choices, perhaps this is the greatest lesson for us all.

Latest Jobs

Find jobs working with children and young people

£32,532 - £38,733, Central London
£26,975 - £29,352 pro rata, East of England
£18,939 - £21,307*, North West England
c. £26k (pro rata 2.5 days pw), Yorkshire and Humberside
 

Latest Tenders