EYFS targets frustrating, says study
By Ben Cook Tuesday, 31 August 2010
Practitioners using the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) often find assessing children's communication, language and literacy levels a cause of "tension and frustration".
A study commissioned by the former Department for Children, Schools and Families and published under the current government, found that among practitioners, there was "criticism of the levels required" by the communication, language and literacy, problem solving, and reasoning and numeracy goals.
But the Practitioners’ Experience of EYFS concluded that the framework does receive high levels of support from all practitioner groups.
The study stated: "Practitioners from different groups in the sector report very different experiences of assessing children. The tensions and pressures that assessment can create, understandably intensify as children approach the end of the foundation stage.
"For many of those working with the youngest children, assessment is clearly a pleasure and an integral part of their daily experience; for some of those working with the oldest children, the engagement with external expectations and requirements is reported to be overwhelmingly demanding."
While head teachers in primary school generally supported the benefits of the EYFS framework, the report found that some felt the level of assessment is "not yet right".
Dame Clare Tickell, chief executive of charity Action for Children, launched a consultation a month ago as part of her independent review of the EYFS.
She is examining whether there is a need for everyone to follow the same curriculum for under-fives and will also address ministerial concerns that the EYFS puts too many bureaucratic burdens on childcare providers.
Anand Shukla, business director at the childcare charity Daycare Trust, said: "The Department for Education research shows increasing numbers of providers support the EYFS.
"We acknowledge many providers find the EYFS profile a long and unwieldy assessment tool and the Tickell review provides an opportunity to improve early years assessment.
"We need much better feedback to parents too, and the single end of EYFS profile could be replaced with a short and accessible annual report to them."
Related Articles
- Review calls for EYFS to be streamlined to cut down on bureaucracy
- EYFS results show girls still outperform boys before school
- Quarter of councils fail to improve early years attainment under EYFS
- EYFS deserves a chance to mature
- Consultation launched to inform EYFS review
- Government urged not to drop EYFS
- Half of under-fives achieve 'good' development since EYFS
Would you like to post a comment?
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Service Manager Catch 22 Up to £32,738, Wolverhampton
- Project Workers Catch 22 Up to £23,762, Wolverhampton
- Contract and Performance Manager Woking YMCA £27,000 per annum pro rata, Woking with travel across Surrey
- Senior Practitioner 1625 Independent People Qualified: £26,276 - £28,636, Bristol and surrounding area
- 3 Project Workers (Mental Health, Accommodation, Learning and Work) 1625 Independent People Various £21,519 and £27,852, Bristol and surrounding area
Most read
- BBC social work film prompts calls for early police support
- YMCA hostel closure to leave 250 young people without housing
- Government urged to address disparate uptake of free childcare
- Social impact bonds to fund intensive therapy in Essex
- Teachers report lack of toilet training among children
- Government adviser voices fears over benefits cap
Most commented
- BBC social work film prompts calls for early police support
- Political parties urged to back loan scheme for childcare
- Government urged to address disparate uptake of free childcare
- Ask the Expert: How to deal with young crushes
- Liverpool council takes reins on Youth Contract delivery
- Young Devon struggles with spike in demand




