Government leaves children's chiefs to decide 'savage' cuts
By Lauren Higgs Tuesday, 15 June 2010
Children's services leaders have been left to agonise over where the axe should fall after the Department for Education (DfE) confirmed councils must decide how to distribute the £311m cuts to the overall area-based grant, leaving school support and Connexions services at risk.
The area-based grant funds teenage pregnancy work, Care Matters and positive activities among others.
Birmingham, one of the larger authorities, is facing a £7.5m cut from the DfE area-based grant, while Essex Council is losing more than £6m. Smaller authority Westminster Council in London is facing a £1.5m cut.
Councillor Paul Dimoldenberg, leader of the Labour group in Westminster, said his authority could not afford to lose £1.5m without damaging frontline services.
"The [government] said these initial cuts would be about reducing waste," he said. "But now we find out they have targeted children for the most savage cuts."
Andrew Cozens, strategic adviser for children's services at the Improvement and Development Agency, warned that the most efficient councils would be worst hit, as they have less scope to cut waste.
"It is quite easy for government to make statements about reducing bureaucracy but then leave it to councils to work out the detail," he said.
Kim Bromley-Derry, former president of the Association of Directors of Children's Services (ADCS), said removing ringfences on the grants would free up resources for local authorities. But warned that directors of children's services would have to examine benefit and cost. "It is important these decisions are evidence-based as there are too few resources to waste on interventions that do not have the expected impact," he said.
Christine Davies, director of the Centre for Excellence and Outcomes in Children's Services (C4EO), said she would be working closely with ADCS to help councils establish which services to protect and which to cut. She added that C4EO and ADCS are in the process of creating a tool to assist councils in calculating the cost effectiveness of service interventions.
"As resources get tighter we are going to have to be as clear as possible about which interventions are the most effective," Davies explained.
A DfE spokesman argued that the reductions in the area-based grant would cut waste, while protecting essential frontline services.
"We expect local authorities to now reassess funding to ensure reductions don't impact on frontline services," he said. "This is about sensible overall reductions across all local authority spending."
What the area-based grant funds in children's services
- Care Matters
- Child death review processes
- Children's Fund
- Child Trust Fund
- Choice Advisers
- Connexions
- Designated Teacher Funding
- Education Health Partnerships
- Extended rights for free travel
- Extended Schools start up
- Flexible 14 to 19 Partnerships Funding
- January Guarantee
- Positive Activities for Young People
- Primary National Strategy
- School Development Grant
- School Improvement Partners
- School Intervention
- School travel advisers
- Secondary behaviour and attendance
- Secondary National Strategy
- Social Care Workforce
- Special Purpose Grant
- Sustainable Travel to School
- Teenage pregnancy
- Travel to School
- Youth substance misuse
- Youth Taskforce
Related Articles
- Lancashire County Council debates drastic cut to children's services budget
- Green Party's Caroline Lucas attacks cuts to Connexions funding
- Hampshire children's services to lose 185 staff as budget slashed by almost £25m
- North Yorkshire children and young people's budget faces £14m of cuts
- Union stages rally against youth cuts
- Cuts force children to play a little less
- Spending cuts could hurt the most vulnerable children
Would you like to post a comment?
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
- Macmillan Family Worker Jigsaw4U Band 5 A4C, Guildford + travel across Surrey
- Senior Macmillan Project Co-ordinator Jigsaw4U Salary scale band 6A4C, Guilford + travel across surrey
- Youth Service Deputy Manager Reigate and Redhill YMCA From £27,000 per annum, East Surrey
- Youth Worker Walsall MBC £25,574 - £27,673, Walsall
- Qualified Social Worker (Targeted Youth Support) Hertfordshire County Council £24,696 to £30,851, East Herts, Broxbourne
Most read
- BBC documentary exposes poor support for struggling parents, claims charity
- BBC social work film prompts calls for early police support
- £10m boost for youth volunteer training
- Young people laud benefits of mentor experience
- YMCA hostel closure to leave 250 young people without housing
- Government urged to address disparate uptake of free childcare
Most commented
- BBC social work film prompts calls for early police support
- Government urged to address disparate uptake of free childcare
- BBC documentary exposes poor support for struggling parents, claims charity
- Revised framework for registered early years provision
- Social impact bonds to fund intensive therapy in Essex
- Becoming Dads




