Video game classification is inadequate
By Simon Vevers
Children & Young People Now
23 September 2008
The government should stop using the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) as a ratings system for computer games as it is not "fit for purpose", a Labour Party fringe meeting was told today.
Paul Jackson, director general of the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA), said the Pan-European Game Information (PEGI) system is the only one that has the power to prevent game publishers distributing unsuitable content to children.
He explained that there is a confusing two-tier system currently operating in the UK, with games rated both under PEGI – the system adopted across Europe – and the BBFC which has limited jurisdiction over games ratings through the Video Recordings Act.
He said the PEGI system was based on standards developed by child safety and games experts who understand games, their impact, their “playability” and their individuality.
However, he said the “linear ratings system” used by the BBFC is “designed for films with a beginning, middle and end where the outcome is always the same. It just can’t cope with the infinite variety and complexity of modern video games and the interaction between players”.
He said BBFC ratings were “out of step with our European neighbours” and argued that the PEGI system was the only one suited to handle the growth of online gaming.
Comments
Please log in or register to comment