Video game classification is inadequate

By Simon Vevers
Children & Young People Now
23 September 2008

The government should stop using the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) as a ratings system for computer games as it is not "fit for purpose", a Labour Party fringe meeting was told today.

Paul Jackson, director general of the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association (ELSPA), said the Pan-European Game Information (PEGI) system is the only one that has the power to prevent game publishers distributing unsuitable content to children.

ADVERTISEMENT

He explained that there is a confusing two-tier system currently operating in the UK, with games rated both under PEGI – the system adopted across Europe – and the BBFC which has limited jurisdiction over games ratings through the Video Recordings Act.

He said the PEGI system was based on standards developed by child safety and games experts who understand games, their impact, their “playability” and their individuality.

However, he said the “linear ratings system” used by the BBFC is “designed for films with a beginning, middle and end where the outcome is always the same. It just can’t cope with the infinite variety and complexity of modern video games and the interaction between players”.

He said BBFC ratings were “out of step with our European neighbours” and argued that the PEGI system was the only one suited to handle the growth of online gaming.

Article Tools
 

Comments

Please log in or register to comment

Posted Comments

There are currently no comments.

You are reading the daily breaking news bulletin from Children & Young People Now.

You must log in or register to make full use of all the site content and features.

Login Here

Latest Jobs

Find jobs working with children and young people

£28,636, East of England
£34,607 - £45,155 per annum, West Midlands
£39,855 - £43,351 pa, South East England
GBP24412 - GBP38975, South East England